Categories
Uncategorized

Essay 1

The Greatest Sacraments

Abby Harris

Just as Aslan was dragged and bound to the Stone Table in Narnia, Jesus was bound to the cross in Jerusalem. Evil watched and surrounded the scenes as both were crucified as a result of their righteous sacrifice. C.S. Lewis uses symbolism in his characters and stories in his novel, The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe to create a modern allegory of the Christian Bible, therefore highlighting the Christian tradition of reading the Bible allegorically, as seen in symbolic meanings of the Old and New Testament. Aslan, the creator and one true king of Narnia is a clear symbol of Jesus Christ in his representation as well as his narrative. Along with the allegory that C.S. Lewis installs in his novel, allegory can be seen throughout the Bible, especially in the narrative of the crossing of the Red Sea in Exodus as a prefiguration of Baptism or a Baptism in itself. 

C.S. Lewis, a devout Christian and writer, suffused many of his works with Christian symbolism and biblical references, including his most famous of novels as part of the Chronicles of Narnia series, The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe. In C.S. Lewis’s fictional world of Narnia, Aslan is the powerful, righteous creator and sovereign who ultimately sacrifices his life to save his people, therefore serving as an allegory for Jesus Christ, the powerful creator of heaven and earth. Throughout the novel, there are many notes of biblical symbolism, but the allegory is most apparent in the death and resurrection of Aslan in the climax of the novel. Aslan sacrifices himself in order to save one of the main characters, Edmund Pevensie (a “Son of Adam” (Lewis)), from the “deep magic” that declares that every traitor belongs to the White Witch for her to kill. In this way, the White Witch is an allegory for Satan, for whom sinners belong to when they are sent to Hell. Despite Edmund having already been forgiven for his sins by his family as well as Aslan, this novel as well as the Bible remind readers that there are consequences for sin. Like Jesus, Aslan himself is sinless, but is willing to sacrifice his own life for those who have sinned. In Jesus’s sacrifice in particular, He saved His people from sin and the detrimental hold that sin had over the world, and Aslan did the same- to save the people of Narnia from sin, the White Witch, and her evil reign. 

When Aslan is brought to the Stone Table, the place of sacrifices in Narnia, he is bound with rope to the table, therefore representative of Jesus being tied to the cross. Furthermore, in both crucifixions, Jesus and Aslan are ridiculed, mocked, and shamed with evil there to witness their death- Aslan’s mane being shaved until he was unrecognizable as a mighty leader (Lewis Chapter 14) and Jesus being publicly mocked, stripped, beaten, spit on, and doubted by priests, scribes, and elders (King James Version with Apocrypha, St. Matthew 27). The Stone Table in Narnia can be seen as a symbol for the stone tablets that bared the Ten Commandments: “And the Lord delivered unto me two tables of stone, even the tables of stone written with the finger of God; and on them was written according to all the words, which the Lord spake with you in the mount of the midst of the fire in the day of the assembly.” (Deuteronomy 9:10). The Ten Commandments on the stone tablets promised punishment for sin, inspiring C.S. Lewis to create the “deep magic” inscribed on the sides of the Stone Table in which in the end would be the impetus for Aslan’s resurrection: “If a willing Victim that has committed no treachery is killed in a traitor’s stead, the Stone Table will crack, and even death itself would turn backwards.” (Lewis Chapter 15). The deep magic, or “law” written on the Stone Table is symbolic of the written code of regulations inscribed on the stone tablets of the Ten Commandments for which the “rules” constitute the essence of religious spirit and tell Christians what God wants from his people and what to do to be a good Christian. Like in the Bible, the “deep magic” is the Emperor’s magic and is written on the Emperor’s scepter as a part of the very foundation of the Narnian creation at the dawn of time. The law of the Ten Commandments and the Stone Table is woven into the very fabric of the created order. The White Witch is ignorant and unaware of the deeper magic that the Emperor of Narnia established before the dawn of time. If the White Witch had known of this deeper magic, she would have known that Aslan’s sacrifice would have ended in his resurrection, as he was without treachery and sin. In the resurrection of Aslan, the Stone Table cracks in two creating a deafening noise, again representative of Jesus’s crucifixion in which “the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent” (Mark 15:38). The tearing in two of the temple can represent the barrier between God and his people whom were trapped within the complications of sin that burdened everyone. The bridge to God was the everlasting life in heaven and Jesus was the bridge. In the case of Narnia, the cracking of the Stone Table was also representative of the burden of sin, particularly in the case of Edmund’s treachery as well as the evil burdened by the White Witch to the people of Narnia. While Jesus’s resurrection took three days and Aslan’s was a matter of a few hours, Jesus and Aslan’s sacrifice provided redemption for all who believed and those like Edmund who needed forgiveness and redemption for his sin: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise form the dead the third day: and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.” (St. Luke 24: 46-47). 

The last notable piece of allegory in the resurrection scene from the novel as well as in the Bible is when Lucy and Susan Pevensie (“Daughters of Eve” (Lewis)) are departing from the Stone Table after sitting with Aslan’s lifeless body for hours when they heard “a great cracking, deafening noise as if a giant had broken a giant’s plate” (Lewis Chapter 15). When they turned back around, they saw that the Stone Table had been broken in half and Aslan was no longer lying lifeless on the table. Then suddenly, Aslan appeared “shining in the sunrise, larger than they had seen him before, shaking his mane” (Lewis Chapter 15). The imagery created by C.S. Lewis of the shining sunrise surrounding Aslan’s resurrected body is representative of heaven, life, rebirth, and God who is the pillar of light. This scene from C.S. Lewis is representative of St. Mark chapter sixteen when Mary Magdalene and the other women go to visit the tomb of Christ only to find it empty (St. Mark 16:1-6), therefore further emphasizing the allegory established by C.S. Lewis in response to the Bible. Both the women in the Bible and the Pevensie sisters are initially instilled with fear and uncertainty, but the emotion that followed the fright was gladness and amazement. 

It is clear from C.S. Lewis’s novel, The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, that Aslan is an allegorical representation of Jesus Christ because they are both powerful yet gentle, righteously angry yet compassionate, inspiring yet frightening, and are as beautiful as they are good. 

Remarked as the greatest act of salvation in the Old Testament is God’s parting of the Red Sea, just as the resurrection of Jesus Christ in the New Testament can be noted as its greatest salvation. The crossing of the Red Sea as told in Exodus is often referred to by Christian commentators as an allegory for Baptism because of its purification, deliverance from evil, and a creation of a new existence for the Israelites. The redeeming action of sacrament is accomplished on different levels in Christian history- in the crossing of the Red Sea, in the death and resurrection of Christ, and in Baptism. While Baptism first originated on Easter night or the day of Jesus’s resurrection, it is often said that the crossing of the Red Sea was a “prophecy in action of the sacrament of Baptism” (DANIÉLOU 90). The deliverance of the Israelites from Egypt by Moses was an act of redemption and true “deliverance” from God is accomplished through Baptism. Redemption in Christianity is the “victory of Christ over the demon, the victory by which humanity is set free.” (DANIÉLOU 89). In the case of the crossing of the Red Sea in Exodus, the demon is Pharoah, and the Israelites are the servants of God who are victorious in crossing the sea without harm, while Pharaoh and his army are destroyed by the water. The Exodus from Egypt can also be seen as a Baptism because it marked “the end of slavery to sin and the entrance into a new existence” for the Hebrews (DANIÉLOU 88). The Israelites did not fear the Red Sea because it delivered them from the evils of the Egyptians. Another major allegory of the crossing of the Red Sea as a Baptism is the simple fact that Baptism is accomplish by the sign of water where sin is drowned, and innocence is saved which is exactly represented in the Exodus. When a person is Baptized with saving water, the devil is destroyed, and man is freed by divine grace (DANIÉLOU 98). In a moral reading of the passage in Exodus of the crossing of the Red Sea, as they were freed by divine grace, readers can have confidence that wickedness within loses all its harmfulness and poison after a Baptism. Pharoah, while being struck down many times, remained obstinate in his wickedness until he came to the waters and was destroyed. The Red Sea when analyzed as an allegory to Baptism can be seen as a baptismal sea.

God is often regarded as the pillar of light, and Baptism as an illumination. Like the symbol of light for God, in the crossing of the Red Sea, the visible symbol of God’s presence was the cloud that followed the Hebrews on their passage through the sea: “all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; and were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea” (1 Corinthians 10:1-2). The cloud designates the Holy Spirit which prefigures the union of water and the Holy Spirit as the elements of Baptism (DANIÉLOU 91). 

Moses in the crossing of the Red Sea can be seen as a figure of Christ for he was the one to strike the waters with his staff to divide the sea, to enter the waters first without danger, and with God’s command, enable Pharoah and his army to be engulfed by the water (Exodus 14:21-28). Just as Christ was sent into the world by the Father to rescue the people from sin, Moses was sent into Egypt by God to rescue the oppressed people from Pharaoh. What God did through Christ was provide spiritual salvation from spiritual slavery while what God did through Moses was provide physical salvation from physical slavery. The difference was being a slave in Egypt and being a slave to sin, for God freed his people from sin just as he freed his people from slavery: “I am the Lord thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage.” (Deuteronomy 5:6). The parting of the Red Sea not only finalized God’s redemption of His people from slavery, but also prefigured God’s redemption of His people from the slavery to sin. 

Bibliography

Carroll, Robert P, and Stephen Prickett. The Bible: Authorized King James Version. Oxford University Press, 1998.

Lewis, C. S. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. Antiquarius, 2021. 

“Types of Baptism: The Crossing of the Red Sea.” The Bible and the Liturgy, by JEAN DANIÉLOU, University of Notre Dame Press, NOTRE DAME, INDIANA, 1956, pp. 86–98. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvpj7fjn.8. Accessed 30 Mar. 2021.

Categories
Uncategorized

Lincoln’s Lyceum Address

In President Abraham Lincoln’s Lyceum Address, he speaks about the dangers of slavery in the United States to a group of young men trying to educate themselves, which therefore could be the reason that Lincoln incorporated religion and biblical references into his speech in order to at least unite the members of the Lyceum under one common belief. 

President Abraham Lincoln’s Lyceum Address speech has many biblical references and like many of his other speeches and writings, it is evident of the influence that the Bible had on Lincoln. To begin, in Lincoln’s opening of the Lyceum address, he classifies the nineteenth century as the “Christain era”. This particular declaration may be used to unite the people in which he is speaking as the rest of his speech is suggesting amendments to the Constitution. A bit further down in the speech, Lincoln references blood, oath, sacrifice, and altars which are words that are symbolic of the Bible: “Let every America, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country….sacrifice unceasingly upon its altars.” Lincoln also makes a comparison between Moses taking the Hebrews out of Egypt and through the desert to find their freedom and the creation of a Hebrew community under God sworn by blood and sacrifice to the blood and sacrifice of the Revolution by which Americans took an oath to the laws of the Constitution. In the case of the American Revolution, it was the blood of the Revolution that made America as people, not the constitution. 

Lincoln also uses the analogy of the breaking of the tablets in the Bible to symbolize how a re-doing and amending of the Constitution may be necessary and would not be a detriment or betrayal to American history. 

Based on the Lyceum Address and other speeches by Lincoln, it seems that as Lincoln is calling for a change, he may be comparing America as an Egypt, a nation of enslavement, rather than a New Jerusalem. 

While Lincoln acknowledges the importance of the Constitution especially for ensuring stability, he also is aware of the costs that it brings to certain people in the nation. And while reform is sure to bring violence (which we can verify 150 years later), Lincoln’s view is that violence may be necessary to ensure a better future for America. 

I think that Lincoln not only uses biblical references because it is what he understands, but also as a way to unite opposing groups together with a religion that they all believe.

Categories
Uncategorized

Preliminary Materials

Draft Enthymeme Argument Sentence

The fantasy novel turned film, The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, written by C.S. Lewis has overt Christian symbolism and its story is structured around the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ as well as infiltrated with other messages relating to stories in the Bible, and can therefore can be noted as to have been influenced by the Bible.

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe  (film)

  • Mr Tumnus refers to Lucy as a “Daughter of Eve” (Narnians refer to all human women this way and men as “Sons of Adam”)
    • biblical reference points to humans as divine creations in God’s image, and their fated destiny to rule Narnia above all of the other magical creatures who live there is in a way a divine right
    • Genesis 
  • Sin and corruption in Narnia in the absence of its ruler, Aslan (representative of Christ in the movie)
  • Father Christmas 
    • “Long live the true king!” 
      • Reference to Aslan but also to Jesus 
  • Snow melting
    • Symbol of the strength and power of christianity against nonbelievers (the White Witch)
  • Aslan and the White Witch battle at the Stone Table (biblical reference to the stone tablets bearing the ten commandments)
    • Exodus 
  • The White Witch as an allegory to Satan
    • When she has the “right” to kill Edmund for being a traitor similar to Satan in which sinners “belong” to in hell 
  • Aslan’s death 
    • Symbolic of the crucifiction 
    • Taunted, shamed, and shaved in public 
    • Sacrifices his own life for Edmund (like Jesus’s sacrifice)
    • Matthew 
  • Aslan’s resurrection 
  • The 4 siblings and Aslan’s triumph at the end of the movie 
    • Represent the inherent righteousness and ultimate unassailability of Christian values
  • Central focus of movie to bible
    • the struggle between Christianity’s tenets of sacrifice, empathy, and striving towards goodness and godlessness, sin, and selfishness
    • Self-discovery and redemption 
      • Story of David or Joseph 
    • 4 siblings are prophesied to save Narnia 

Scholarly Sources 

https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/sociologyofreligion/tag/the-lion-the-witch-and-the-wardrobe/

Walls, Kathryn. “An Analogous Adversary: The Old Dispensation in The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe.” Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, vol. 28, no. 2 (99), 2017, pp. 202–218. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26499447. Accessed 16 Mar. 2021.

Ruud, Jay. “Aslan’s Sacrifice and the Doctrine of Atonement in ‘The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe.’” Mythlore, vol. 23, no. 2 (88), 2001, pp. 15–22. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/26814624. Accessed 16 Mar. 2021.

“The Christian Imaginary: Narnia.” C.S. Lewis, by William Gray, Liverpool University Press, 1998, pp. 60–89. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv5rf40g.11. Accessed 16 Mar. 2021.

Categories
Uncategorized

King James vs. Sidney’s Psalter

Because the style and diction of the two translations, King James Version and Sidney’s Psalter, are so different, the exactness of the translation is more questionable in Sidney’s  Psalter translation due to the added tone, style and diction. 

Psalm Chapter 51 (King James Version of the Bible) is written by David in response to his great sin that he committed with Bathsheba, one of his mighty men’s wives. Knowing that Bathsheba is Uriah’s wife, David decides to commit adultery with her anyways while her husband is away at battle and she becomes pregnant. In an attempt to fix his problem, David has Uriah placed at the frontlines of a deadly battle in which Uriah is killed. After all of this sin, God sends the prophet Nathan to rebuke David for his sins. In the end, David repents and God removes his sin, but not without forever consequences. In Psalm 41:4, David pleads for God’s forgiveness saying “Against thee, thee only, have I sinned” meaning that David believes that the only one that he sinned against was God, not including Uriah whose wife he got pregnant and had him killed. However, ultimately, David believes that the greatest sin was to God. In verse 5 of Psalm chapter 51, David admits that he was conceived and born with sin, concluding that the sin is his alone and that he deserves whatever punishment he will receive from God. 

Moving on to the Psalm chapter 51 translation of the bible in the Sidneys’ Psalter, there are immediate differences between the two translations. First, and most obvious to me, is the rhyming pattern. In verse 15 of Sidney’s Psalter, the same message is revealed that was written in verse 5 of the King James Version reading, “My mother, loe! When I began to be, conceiving me, with me did sinne conceive”. While the message is the same, the style and diction is very different. With the rhyming pattern implemented into this translation, it would be difficult to have an exact translation considering that words must be chosen carefully. While the same message may be made as in the King James Version, the diction, style, and tone make the read entirely different. 

Categories
Uncategorized

Prayer and Punishment

Sections 37-42 in The Life of St. Antony and 1 Kings and 2 Samuel in the Bible represent the power of God because of his response to both prayer and sin. 

In The Life of St. Anthony, passages 37-42 discuss the faith that men must have in God and shall not be esteemed for casting out demons for themselves, rather they shall acknowledge that it is a favor from God who granted it. In many of Anthony’s stories about his encounters with demons, he says that they often came to him in disguises however, “you might learn not to faint in discipline, nor to fear the devil nor the delusions of the demons.” Following the example of Anthony, prayer and holding steadfast to the love of God seemed the most successful way of ridding the demons. Basically, putting you faith in God to rid yourself of the evil that is persisting. Similar to in 1 Kings chapter 17, Elijah goes and stays with a widow where he discovers that she is preparing a final meal for her and her son before they die of starvation. Upon God’s request, Elijah pleads with the widow to allow him to have the last meal and that then their food will never run out. She allows this and their food does not run out. The widow learns that Elijah was right, however, her son still dies. Elijah pleads and prays for God to restore the window’s son’s soul and so he does, restoring the widow’s faith in Elijah and that he is a man of God and speaks the truth. This passage in 1 Kings reminds me of the passage in The Life of Antony because it represents the power of prayer and the extent of God’s answers. The widow witnesses God’s power and is then a believer of Elijah’s truth. Both Anthony and the widow put their faith in God and their prayers, and they were answered. 

Another passage from the Bible that reminds me of the sections from The Life of Antony, is in 2 Samuel chapters 11-12 where David sins against God by having an affair, getting the woman pregnant, and then intentionally having the woman’s husband murdered in battle. As punishment for David’s sins, God makes David’s house forever at war and gives his son a disease in which he dies from. This section again reminds me of the extent of God’s power and the punishment that can ensue if you sin against him.

Categories
Uncategorized

Exodus and The Ten Commandments

One thing that stood out to me overall between the film and Exodus is the conciseness of the first part of Moses’s story in Exodus versus how much detail is included in the film. The first two hours of the film are covered in just one chapter of Exodus. In chapter two of Exodus, Moses’s Hebrew mother had hid him for three months out of fear that he would be killed by the Egyptians for being a male newborn. Finally, when she felt that she could no longer hide him, she floated him down the river (Exodus 2:3). This scene is very similar to the movie in which Moses’s mother puts him in a basket as the sister watches where Moses goes from afar. Different from the movie, however, is how Moses’s sister speaks with the Pharaoh’s daughter and says that she can find a Hebrew woman to breastfeed the child and gets Moses’s birth mother to do the job (Exodus 2:9). In the film, Moses’s sister does not approach the Pharaoh’s daughter and instead watches from a distance as her brother is named Prince and is immediately adored by the daughter of Pharaoh and scorned by her maid. After Moses grew, he then became the Pharaoh’s daughter’s son instead of the instant that she found him like the movie portrayed. The chosen name for the baby, Moses, is explained in the same way in both variations of the story of Moses: “Because I drew him out of the water” (Exodus 2:10) and “Because I drew you from the water, you shall be called Moses!” (The Ten Commandments 17:20). While Moses’s time as a mere child is briefly described in Exodus and the film, the film greatly details part of Moses’s adult life in two hours while Exodus details the same time frame in just ten verses (Exodus 2: 11-20). A question that I have about the difference in detail between the two variations of Moses’s story is whether the writers of the film created these missing pieces, followed other accounts of Moses’s story, or if the Bible later fills in these missing details that the film seems to account for.